Spirituality Revealed

https://veritaspub.com/product/emotions-and-sensations-april-2004-lecture-2-1/

Transcript:
See most of the greater thinkers of the Western world were concerned with what is truth and how does one know it? How can truth be identified? And the scientific method, the Darwinian theory of causation, and the sequence of the dialectic, was as close as man could get to truth – which is really a problem in epistemology and semantics actually: If I define a thing as meaning this, and this meets this, then I have said something about reality. The jump there is if you proved it in mind and intellect, that doesn't mean you've said anything about the world 'out there.' It may or may not be in accord between the belief system and reality.

Alright, so that means you've moved out of this field. So this is the provable world, the Newtonian paradigm, which is form. The limitation of form. This is the world of provability. This is the world of science. But when is a thing true? It's only true within a certain context. You can make a statement that sounds 100% true, all I have to do is change one condition and it becomes falsehood. So what is ostensibly true is true only because it's within a stated context.

The problem with politics, etc, is it takes a statement out of context, very often out of historical context. Alright so a thing is only so within a stated context. And retrograde blame, you know, which is the current headlines, “oh why didn't who do what when?” etc. So the game of blame is endless, and how far back do you what to go in history?

So a thing is only true by definition within a stated field which is called the proximate field. The proximate field can be political positions at the time, it can be the weather, and it can be glamour. One of the most powerful proximate fields in the media, in which you can take anything and glamorize it. Torturing people, whatever you want to do, you can glamorize it and sell it and make money at it.

Alright, so the infinite context, which is the infinite context is kinesiology, is not the proximate field, but it's the field which makes has the power to transform the unmanifest into the manifest. The power of Creation comes out of an infinite field of the unmanifest becoming manifest, and the mechanism is intention, yeah?

Alright, so truth then can only be defined within a certain context. This can meet all the criteria of the intellect, but in this field it's fallacious. So you have to always state the field. So we can move on. That's never been done before, nobody has ever defined truth, and that's one reason why they argue about truth, is because it's not within the structure. It's the structure within a specific field, okay?

So this is just a delineation of that. The content of the field is the ego. The proximate field is the spiritualized ego. And the infinite context is the spirit. It is because of the spirit that man even concerns himself with ethics or morality. It doesn't dawn on other species, other than man. The content, as you saw from the diagram, is linear and specific. The proximate field, which is really the field of non-linear dynamics, is semi-linear. It's somewhat linear, but it's also somewhat non-linear. And the infinite context is beyond time.

That which is within the box is definable. That which is outside the box can no longer be defined, but it can be described. “The situation was favourable.” You can't measure favourable, and yet if its favourable or unfavourable will make a difference in the outcome.

Alright, so the proximate field we can say is describable. And subjectively it's experiential. You walk into a room and you “get” where the room is at, totally. Nobody can prove that, nobody can demonstrate it, you can't measure it. You know they're up to no good or not (laughter). Instantly you know that.

Alright, so this world here, the Newtonian world, is predictable. As we get outside the limitation of the box then, you start to see randomness, you see the non-linear dynamics.

Here it's measurable, here it's identifiable, we can describe that which is within form. Beyond form you can only know it. You can know what love is, it's a subjective awareness. It's not really possible to describe it. The poet tries to but he doesn't really get there.

Within the box, you've got force. The proximate field has an influence, and the infinite field potentiates. The power to go from the unmanifest to the manifest is the infinite power of divinity, hmm?

This is within time, this is outside of time. This is located, this is generalized, this is provable, and here you're talking about likelihoods. Can you prove anything about kinesiology? No. I know that right off the bat, because I know it calibrates at 600. Nothing at 600 is provable. You can demonstrate it, you can explain it, you can be it, but you can't prove it.