On this Unity Church of Sedona June 2006 cd Dr. Hawkins speaks about converting spiritual concepts and belief systems into experiential reality. He explains how interference with the experience of the Presence of God is at all times arising out of instinctual responses. There is a meditation and two sermons with an introduction by Rev. Sandra Soley Keep.
#DavidHawkins #Buddhism #Spirituality
https://veritaspub.com/product/unity-church-of-sedona-june-2006-cd/
Thanks! Share it with your friends!
On this Unity Church of Sedona June 2006 cd Dr. Hawkins speaks about converting spiritual concepts and belief systems into experiential reality. He explains how interference with the experience of the Presence of God is at all times arising out of instinctual responses. There is a meditation and two sermons with an introduction by Rev. Sandra Soley Keep.
#DavidHawkins #Buddhism #Spirituality
Comments are disabled for this post.
){kind=link}
I am really sorry if the first tittle I gave the video offended anyone, it was never my intention🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
I think she is right and it brings up the question if I recall correctly, what is a King without his Queen?
He’s Christian. That’s why he’s so sexist and narrow minded. This completely turned me off
He’s a bully
Now you've gotten me really interested in this topic and it's igniting loads of questions.
The first ones were of the type: How do we know that no women reached that level (1000) historically? Did he as that question, or did he just calibrate the ones he was familiar with?
If we presume that it's a true historical fact (as said in the clip), I got curious as to why. Could it have to do with level of detachment? Women are, I would claim (I'm making a broooaaad generalization here) perhaps more attached (to the physical as well as others) both through the nature of their bodies (designed for the possibility of carrying another human being) and tradition (being taught from an early age to put others' needs before your own) and thus have a bigger threshold in terms of complete detachment (choosing to "stay" at a bodhisattva level, still connected to their environment)? (I'm thinking out load here, feel free to argue my claims)
Then… I got to the really fun part: What if there is a negative to the scale? Where all the levels are the same as on the positive, meaning level -1000 is also complete ego dissolution, but of a feminine kind (agnosia? dark knowledge?), perhaps a major cause of feminine persecution (witch burnings etc.) in western (masculine run) society, because it's been seen (still is) as a threat to masculine dominance.
he said 1000 not enlightment williestudyurself can u calibrate the highest women that ever lived
“Almighty and ever-living God: We ask to be Thy servant, O’Lord, and to be a vehicle of Divine Love, a channel of Thy Will. We ask for direction and Divine assistance, and we surrender all personal will through devotion to Thy Truth. We dedicate our life to Thy service. Help us to choose love and peace above all other options, and to surrender all of our judgements to Thee, that we might have unconditional love and compassion for all of life in all of its expressions and surrender our very life to Thee at all times in all places.
Gloria in Excelsis Deo, now and forever, Amen.” 🙏
Dr. David R. Hawkins
It’s evident from the comments that many assume to know and fail to have the humility to realize that Dr. Hawkins knows what he is talking about. He is simply stating facts.
As long as she is stuck with gender and feminism she will never reach enlightenment
I feel like David Hawkins is full of shit.
Its good that he let's himself be open to critique and doesn't take himself too seriously, when she made the joke about the truth lady, kind of makes him more likable to me
Since the lives women have been excluded from most historical records, it’s not possible to know how many enlightened women there may have been. Even if there was one, who would have thought it was worth mentioning? If someone did write it down somewhere, because it was about a women, who would have bothered preserving it? History is full of holes.
What a fantastic WOmen ♥️
I can't believe this lady is bringing some kind of female insecurity into a spiritual study — instead of RELEASING her insecurity she is just trying to change history.
Who cares if most people Enlightened have been Male…. pssf Who cares?
It doesn't matter…. like at all. What matters is letting go of all insecurities, resentments, hates, judgement, positionalities….. etc. If she just let go of that insecurity she would be all good and perfect and achieve happiness. 😀 😀 🙂 🙂
Which is what really matters !!
Not History. History shouldn't matter to this lady as just as just releasing… 🙂 And then she will achieve highest happiness 😀
Doc has never said that women cannot achieve enlightenment. Doc mentions some enlightened women like Teresa de Avila, Mechthild of Magdeburg, etc.
That her physical body cannot tolerate the level of an avatar (around 1000) is very different. Hardly anyone reaches that level on earth, and doc mentions that it is rare for a man to tolerate such levels (for purely physical reasons). But the enlightenment is at 600, and there were women above that level, and therefore the title is misleading.
I've been sporadically reading some of the Hawkins quotes you post, and he always seems somewhat of point to me, too narrow in his thinking. Hearing him here, for the first time, only confirmed it to me. Having this guy as a main teacher would probably make it difficult for anyone to see the full picture. But to each their own…
Perhaps because women are naturally enlightened, so they do not need to push this information into the eyes of other humans, as they think it is normal… or because for ages they were denied the right to education so they were not able to write so many wise books… or because they do not have such a big ego to thing that what they know and see is so special it needs to be named ENLIGHTENMENT …. or because they are not as pushy as men to display their experiences… just a few guesses. Thank you for your questions :))
Who wrote this (hi)story? Spiritual sexism. Wonderful storytelling and so enlightening 🤓
We're all one under the heavens. Women stand the same chance of being enlightened as men. It never was about male/female and I don't think the doc was trying to make it about sex here either.
Yikes get Karen off the stage, we are not interested in your feminist bs
Interesting video, thanks
No, you don't have to be born in a male body to be enlightened. India has a rich spiritual history and has given birth to many female siddhas, Maa Sharada and Maa Anandamayi are two names that immediately come to my mind. I'm sure there are others in all parts of the world. Also, not every enlightened person chooses to publicly share their wisdom, so we never come to know those who choose to stay invisible.
Wow, absolutely unnecessary and uninteresting. This just discredited you greatly. If this is the content you're putting out now, you've lost me as a subscriber. We must cut out dense low vibrational information if we are to embrace and become love and light. Inclusion and oneness are the messages to be spreading.
The reason Doc seemed indifferent towards her is because she was operating from an egoic positionality. Most people would react and defend, thus getting into a positionality of their own. Because doc didn't do that, it seemed on the surface as if he was indifferent towards your question. However he was not operating from a level of blame or shame. He was just seeing things as they are and pointing them out. The best way for a woman to advocate for women is not to advocate for women at all but to advocate for human beings as a whole.
Esther hicks etc are like hmmm what? lol