Doc gives added insight into the fields of consciousness and his calibrations.
In this wonderful clip, he also answers the question: “How far up the scale is it possible to go in one lifetime?”
Taken from the January 2002 lecture, “Causality: The Ego’s Foundation”.
As a subscriber of our streaming video service, all of Dr. Hawkins’ lectures are available: http://veritaspub.com/streaming-product information
From the pits of sheer agony just existing, all the way to the pinnacle of inner harmony and beyond! But don't try this at home.
Thank you❤
I went to the top of the scale easily
1 year for me i went through my twin flame journey storyline (darknight of the soul) Hebrew word for soul (neshamah), and candle (ner) both begin with the letter NUN.= Light Soul ( 3rd temple is your heart) ❤ Easy.
👁️♓👁️
"What am I?"
I can vouch for this. I have had a life of great negative karma, lots of trauma, dysfunction, addiction, mental health to profound mystical experiences and taking the narrow path that Christ talks about.
Holy Holy Holy is the Supreme Creator of the Universes and beyond,.
We are ALL worthy and able to completely transmute our energies and life if we are able to persistently do the 'work' to deprogram ourselves from all the nonsense. Everyone of us is able to go from 'scumbag' to divinity
Since we have one life than stand before God in judgement, the real question is, "How well have you come to know the One Who created you and redeemed you?"
What if person learns something new? That no one ever imagined or build before
Surrender your WILL! Why? The illusion is thinking you have one…..lol
I don't think Ramana meant that the who am I question was literally another I. On discovery that I is no thing. Nothing personal.
Corrects Ramana's phrase "who am i" to "what am i" and then goes on to consider Hinduism as a religion. "An ordinary religious person – a Hindu". Hindu is a people.
'Who am i' isn't incorrect because Atman isn't objective – such an inner question commencing enquiry leading to contemplation is the way. 'What am i' entails a 'something' – a what? Not this; what about that? 'What' cannot be designated to the subject of Atman. Who am i seems the better phrase because it already does away with the 'what' thing. The Who, and the, am i, entails Thou art That. Who am i – Thou art That. What am i – not this, not this. Lexicon. How much does it really matter? I'm getting into Veda, and people say the english translations are horrible. And this may be true. Regardless, such profound texts require interpretation from the inner eye. Maybe it's not so much how it's translated, but how one interprets it.
Ramana Maharshi's stories are exemplary and sometimes i play his teaching on the "Medicine of one" channel while sleeping. Meditating on the Self seems to be a very key part of the teaching, getting through the 5 sheaths of bodies to come closer to the Source.